Did not think I was, my post was tongue in cheekWilliam Joseph1 wrote:I do thank you, ergo you are not in either category.
Did not think I was, my post was tongue in cheekWilliam Joseph1 wrote:I do thank you, ergo you are not in either category.
As I'm in a league of my own, which of the two do I fall into in your "humble" opinion?William Joseph1 wrote:The other couple of people I never thank are for personal reasons. IE: I simply do not like them, one is a racist and the other is an idiot. I am simply highlighting something that in my opinion is broken (for whatever reason).
What makes you think you fall into either category? If I have not thanked you for the last few months then it could be because I do not consider you have posted anything worthwhile. For sure I do not thank duplicate posts. But maybe you should look at your own track record of giving thanks. An average of two to three thanks per month since you joined, not exactly generous.Thunderfog wrote:As I'm in a league of my own, which of the two do I fall into in your "humble" opinion?William Joseph1 wrote:The other couple of people I never thank are for personal reasons. IE: I simply do not like them, one is a racist and the other is an idiot. I am simply highlighting something that in my opinion is broken (for whatever reason).
Whilst I understand there is room for improvement in the Thanks System of Reward, I also understand that any change is likely to require valuable computer programming time and costs - we are always lead to believe that iMutual has limited funds in its current format so therefore this cost could be better spent elsewhere on the website...richard@imutual wrote:I'm open to suggestions on how to improve itWilliam Joseph1 wrote:The thanks system on here in my opinion is not up to scratch and is greatly under used.
Any other (positive) suggestions for website improvements...?Boro Boy wrote:Whilst I understand there is room for improvement in the Thanks System of Reward, I also understand that any change is likely to require valuable computer programming time and costs - we are always lead to believe that iMutual has limited funds in its current format so therefore this cost could be better spent elsewhere on the website...richard@imutual wrote:I'm open to suggestions on how to improve itWilliam Joseph1 wrote:The thanks system on here in my opinion is not up to scratch and is greatly under used.
My vote is that funds could be better spent making the website more mobile friendly, this might end up generating additional income (which could also be spent enhancing the website) something unlikely to be obtained by dealing with the Thanks mechanism first.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests