Post-of-the-month results - May 2017

kevinchess1
Posts: 23770
Joined: Mon Jun 28 2010 11:02pm
Location: Miles away from the sea
Has thanked: 12599 times
Been thanked: 17167 times
Contact:

Re: Post-of-the-month results - May 2017

Post by kevinchess1 » Tue Jun 06 2017 8:13am

Not sure if this is the place to debate this
but
When the limit was set at 10,000 there were barely a handful of members with more than that
Now, I suspect more members do and I'm wondering if we should increase it to 20,000?
Thoughts?
Thanked by: blythburgh, expressman33
Politically incorrect since 69

BeautifulSunshine
Posts: 26721
Joined: Tue Sep 14 2010 8:23pm
Location: [The Finest City in the World: London]
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 3686 times
Contact:

Re: Post-of-the-month results - May 2017

Post by BeautifulSunshine » Tue Jun 06 2017 1:11pm

kevinchess1 wrote:Awarded shares
If memory serves, and maybe it's changed,
There's a limit of 10,000 when deciding tied winners
That's what confused me. I was thinking that Kev must be on 500,000 shares by now at the very least. The 10,000 limit makes the numbers add up.
[imutual Cashback Investment Club]

kevinchess1
Posts: 23770
Joined: Mon Jun 28 2010 11:02pm
Location: Miles away from the sea
Has thanked: 12599 times
Been thanked: 17167 times
Contact:

Re: Post-of-the-month results - May 2017

Post by kevinchess1 » Wed Jun 07 2017 10:50am

William Joseph wrote:
underdog wrote:
blythburgh wrote:wow thanks to everyone for voting for me and the dawg for inspiring the original post.
My humble pleasure M'Lady.

Congratulations to everyone.


hang on hang on hang on
It was Supperman long LONG list of BSE posts that prompted bb post
AND
I think some credit should go to WJ who posted 'If it wins POTM maybe RY will do something'
He Tweeted it on his Facebook page

I might be wrong as I have neither, but I don't think you can twitter on your Facebook.


I bow to your superior knowledge of Social Media
I'll Snapchat you on Whatsapp later
Politically incorrect since 69

Richard Frost
Posts: 13232
Joined: Tue Jun 29 2010 8:14pm
Location: The Isle of Dreams
Has thanked: 2874 times
Been thanked: 6862 times

Re: Post-of-the-month results - May 2017

Post by Richard Frost » Wed Jun 07 2017 10:59am

I do have Whatsapp, but I will pass on giving you the number. I would be worried the bullshit would infect me.
Thanked by: kevinchess1

expressman33
Posts: 12468
Joined: Tue Jun 29 2010 10:36pm
Location: stockport
Has thanked: 3006 times
Been thanked: 10641 times
Contact:

Re: Post-of-the-month results - May 2017

Post by expressman33 » Wed Jun 07 2017 6:57pm

kevinchess1 wrote:Not sure if this is the place to debate this
but
When the limit was set at 10,000 there were barely a handful of members with more than that
Now, I suspect more members do and I'm wondering if we should increase it to 20,000?
Thoughts?
I'd say even more , perhaps 40,000
Thanked by: kevinchess1

BeautifulSunshine
Posts: 26721
Joined: Tue Sep 14 2010 8:23pm
Location: [The Finest City in the World: London]
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 3686 times
Contact:

Re: Post-of-the-month results - May 2017

Post by BeautifulSunshine » Wed Jun 07 2017 11:27pm

kevinchess1 wrote:Not sure if this is the place to debate this
but
When the limit was set at 10,000 there were barely a handful of members with more than that
Now, I suspect more members do and I'm wondering if we should increase it to 20,000?
?
Indeed. Whilst I rarely win I do agree that the circumstances have changed and the 10,000 limit needs to be reviewed.

I would say a new limit in the region of 50,000 shares.
Thanked by: kevinchess1
[imutual Cashback Investment Club]

kevinchess1
Posts: 23770
Joined: Mon Jun 28 2010 11:02pm
Location: Miles away from the sea
Has thanked: 12599 times
Been thanked: 17167 times
Contact:

Re: Post-of-the-month results - May 2017

Post by kevinchess1 » Wed Jun 07 2017 11:47pm

William Joseph wrote:I do have Whatsapp, but I will pass on giving you the number. I would be worried the bullshit would infect me.
Think it's too late to worry about that...
Politically incorrect since 69

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests