I would have thought that 10-1 against was a conclusive nomagnificent7 wrote:we just need "a further poll on the special circumstances under which someone would be allowed to use a banner" now.
Sadly the result shows either that the vast majority of members were unconcerned about the outcome or unaware of the issue - you could say that 10 members voted for but that 3692 did not.expressman33 wrote:I would have thought that 10-1 against was a conclusive no
zulu17 wrote:Sadly the result shows either that the vast majority of members were unconcerned about the outcome or unaware of the issue - you could say that 10 members voted for but that 3692 did not.expressman33 wrote:I would have thought that 10-1 against was a conclusive no
Its perfectly clearkevinchess1 wrote:zulu17 wrote:Sadly the result shows either that the vast majority of members were unconcerned about the outcome or unaware of the issue - you could say that 10 members voted for but that 3692 did not.expressman33 wrote:I would have thought that 10-1 against was a conclusive no
OR
1 voted against but 3702 did not
Even more conclusive
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests