Search found 285 matches

Return

by rayf
Tue Jan 24 2012 3:34pm
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Proposed change to "shares for posting"

Kalpesh wrote:I personally like the old way of gaining shares to be honest.
I'm happy with it as it is - seems to work well. :)
by uglysteve
Tue Jan 24 2012 3:17pm
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Proposed change to "shares for posting"

The idea of capping rewards based on unique posts AND unique thankers is: - To encourage members to post multiple quality posts, rather than relying on a single 'blockbuster' (already recognised in POTM) - To minimise abuse of the system, where the same posters keep thanking each other I don't real...
by Kalpesh
Tue Jan 24 2012 1:33pm
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Proposed change to "shares for posting"

I personally like the old way of gaining shares to be honest.
by blythburgh
Tue Jan 24 2012 12:31pm
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Proposed change to "shares for posting"

I find the idea of "thanks" getting a reward a pointless one. OK I do not consider the shares to be more than pie in the sky but live in hope. A bit like buying a lottery ticket, you hope but,in truth, do not expect to be rich.
by magnificent7
Tue Jan 24 2012 3:56pm
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Proposed change to "shares for posting"

I think it is premature to do away with a scheme that has clearly paid dividends. Why will someone post here when they can post on more prestigious forums?

If it's not broken- don't fix it.
by Mel
Sun Jan 01 2012 12:03pm
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

You are not authorised to read this forum.
by badtothebone
Fri Feb 03 2012 8:21pm
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Proposed change to "shares for posting"

Well I may as well have my two penniworth worth, if it's worth even that? Personally I don't need 'thanks', a gold star or a paper hat to post something I hope is useful to someone. If a member can't give a bit of news, open a debate, post a freebie, a good offer or tell a joke freely without the pr...