kevinchess1 wrote:Yes and this is quite independent of Imutual
It's decided by Brucey

I somehow feel that this post may win POTM...

Although I hasten to add that in a particular month when I only rated two posts, Kevin's vote put me into third place.

Simple solution: everyone should earn more shares, so that they can compete with Bruce

if this site goes bust then shareholder will not be liable same as if any company goes bust. Is it the same for PLC's? I'm no expert, but if I invest in (for example) Centrica plc and they go bust, the shareholders won't be liable for anything as the shares are "fully paid up" (i.e. the nominal val...

I have suggested that a 50% site gets run in parallel to the 100% site as I believe that many members would also do certain offers at 100% and 50% rate thus giving the company a nice reward for certain offers it adds to both sites, the idea would be that all offers go on this site in the first inst...

Also whitelabel sites. Many cashback sites run branded cashback websites on behalf of large organisations (e.g. VAC run the Mirror cashback website) which typically run on a revenue sharing model. If imutual could run one (or even two) whitelabels on a 50% basis (offering no shares), then this might...

Well done to the winners, but this is why I try to be "restrained" with my Thanks. As you've probably guessed, I have 19489 shares, so I think capping to 10000 is a good idea so that I don't have to worry about what I'm thanking. (Although this capping should only be applied to "fun" things like POT...

If you then simply use the 'click to use now' button right by your voucher code, it directs to Amazon with the TCB tracking code. So anyone who had done that just to apply their voucher to their Amazon account, but then who when making purchases at a later date may want to get 'points' for Amazon e...

There is an annual report, with some numbers (including how much the "assets" were sold for), at this website: http://www.fashost.co.uk/pwddocs/6292/6 ... report.pdf

Username and password required, which would have been supplied earlier in the process.

I joined Quidco and Rpoints on the same day. I was member number fifty-something at Quidco and it is amazing to see how much they have grown in size since then. Respect to them for that, but back in 2005, Rpoints had something that Quidco lacked which is why I became a hardcore Rpointer.

But on the cashback front too, you increasingly see complaints about reliability and lack of response from the big sites - who actually did a fantastic job of that, originally, and it's how they established their success, not just by offering the best rates. I find this very important. I'd rather h...