I propose a vote to change the CIC constitution to allow the units of a leaving member to be bought by an existing member. In order for a vote to take place three needs to be three in total members wishing to vote on the subject matter. Why make it dependent on the rare occasion when a member leave...

Or is the problem here Underdog?

I held SLA for ages and they were always good, the merger has been pretty successful and costs of doing business will come down because of it. Divi is great too: I'd agree with the above.

ITV looks attractive. 5pc down today.

This must be due soon as we missed January.

In the absence of literally anything else, I'd support more formality in the buying and selling of shares, as per RIchards idea. I hoped that the new year might spark some kind of new approach and I'm happy to try anything out that means we converge more frequently to plot a route. Activity here is ...

I['ve had a quick read through and I agree with this in principle. Thanks to garindan for formulating this, and for richard on his work earlier in the process.

She has been treated no differently than any other person in her situation. In my view it is important that Justice is done. Even more so in that the decision by the Government has been widely condemned as wrong. Without Legal Aid that is not possible. So I have no problems with her or anyone else ...

I voted to hold - if we're going to do these small non-div shares then I'd be hoping for a move more like 15-20% before we considered moving them on as it looks like this one fluctuates quite frequently and I'm not sure we're really set up to 'trade' it with our historically slow response times!

Happy Birthday 5ue 0h I hope you have a lovely day.

(Did I get it right?)