Neither truecashbacklover wrote:
This is what K,C said has gained him his current perceived "power" - Possibly 12000 + awarded shares, no referrals and no spreading the word"
I'm second in the 'Sharing League Table
Not true eithercashbacklover wrote:
And as Peaches40 has pointed out
“At the end of the day we are all equal, doesn't really matter if you've millions of shares they're all currently worth the same – Zero"
Shares are worth whatever someone will pay for them Imutual shares have an 'Unknown Value' you turn down £10 for your shares so, logically, you feel there worth more than that.
I wouldn't take £10 for my shares either.
Yes but I feel that I've earnt minecashbacklover wrote:as K.C has kindly pointed out in most companies
“They buy them or get them as part of their job benefits”
Don't mean that the top 2 are wrong though does itcashbacklover wrote: Currently should I-Mutuals top two members shareholders both vote the same way at any given time then the views of I-Mutual regular forum contributors who are loyal to the company would effectively be of no consequence even if 8 or more as an example expressed same opinion via a vote albeit differing from the top 2 –
And What if they both voted different?
Then other poster views would matter
We currently have a coalition govement kept in power by a smallish party