imutual.co.uk

rayf wrote:

blythburgh wrote:Wot about the dyslexics? If you can prove you have dyslexia then you should be expempt from the correct speeling rool

But if you can spell dyslexia or dyslexic then you are obbiosly not a sufferrrer from this afflictan.

should only be exempt if you're a member of the DNA (National Dyslexics Association)

Cue sudden boost to membership numbers of that organisation.

We're actually going to start adding these 'share rewards for posting' to your statements on a daily basis (Some of you may notice this has appeared already). There will be one transaction per month per reward type, and we'll add to it on a daily basis (e.g. if you post at least once on 20 of the 31 days in July, you'll end up with one transaction for 20 shares at the end of July)

now that sounds like a far better idea

is the max per month 20 shares now or have i read it wrong?

1 share per day for posting. 1 share per day for starting a new active topic

So maximum of 62 shares possible this month

Are there any plans to vet the quality of the posts? Whilst I understand it is fair enough to award 1 share to everyone who posts, surely some posts are more worthy than others. Shouldn't they be rewarded more? I don't want a complicated scheme to be introduced but couldn't one thanks be worth 1 share?

AuPt

aupt wrote:Are there any plans to vet the quality of the posts? Whilst I understand it is fair enough to award 1 share to everyone who posts, surely some posts are more worthy than others. Shouldn't they be rewarded more? I don't want a complicated scheme to be introduced but couldn't one thanks be worth 1 share?

AuPt

there's already things in place to award good posts such as QOTM

anyway, we don't want to give too many of our shares away - it just devalues whatever (few) we have already

aupt wrote:couldn't one thanks be worth 1 share?

It would certainly be fairer but would this run the risk of turning the Thanks system (working well so far) into a 'You thank me and I'll thank you' affair?

rayf wrote:

aupt wrote:Are there any plans to vet the quality of the posts? Whilst I understand it is fair enough to award 1 share to everyone who posts, surely some posts are more worthy than others. Shouldn't they be rewarded more? I don't want a complicated scheme to be introduced but couldn't one thanks be worth 1 share?

AuPt

there's already things in place to award good posts such as QOTM

Yes and this is quite independent of Imutual
It's decided by Brucey

kevinchess1 wrote:Yes and this is quite independent of Imutual
It's decided by Brucey

I somehow feel that this post may win POTM...

Although I hasten to add that in a particular month when I only rated two posts, Kevin's vote put me into third place.