Page 1 of 2

Do dogs really need a microchip?

Posted: Sat Apr 21 2012 5:19pm
by BeautifulSunshine
I'm in favour of it as there's some nasty dogs around our area. It'll encourage the owners to be more responsible. Although I feel sorry for the good owners who will be left with a unwanted invoice. What do you think?

Re: Do dogs really need a microchip?

Posted: Sat Apr 21 2012 5:50pm
by badtothebone
Of course, so long as it's McCain's!

Re: Do dogs really need a microchip?

Posted: Sat Apr 21 2012 6:03pm
by kevinchess1
The peeple who thought up this are barkin :lol:

Re: Do dogs really need a microchip?

Posted: Sat Apr 21 2012 6:34pm
by Mel
Might be better to chip the owner?

Re: Do dogs really need a microchip?

Posted: Sat Apr 21 2012 9:10pm
by annfen
I'm in favour - and for the owner too! - good idea

Re: Do dogs really need a microchip?

Posted: Sat Apr 21 2012 10:23pm
by kevinchess1
There's a film called 'Wedlock'
2 criminals hav xspolsive necklaces witch blow their heads off if they are ever more than 10 meters apart :shock:
I'd vote for that for dogs/ownwers :thumbup:

Re: Do dogs really need a microchip?

Posted: Sat Apr 21 2012 11:25pm
by kevinchess1
Microchi[ps for small dogs
whereas bigga dogs can hav Pont Neuf
(That joke waisted hear :( )

Re: Do dogs really need a microchip?

Posted: Sun Apr 22 2012 3:46pm
by expressman33
If you do this to a dachshund, you could have sausage and chips :lol:

Re: Do dogs really need a microchip?

Posted: Sun Apr 22 2012 8:09pm
by magnificent7
postal workers union is over the moon

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17807349

Re: Do dogs really need a microchip?

Posted: Sun Apr 22 2012 8:33pm
by itsmeagain
Might just lead to more abandoned dogs roaming the streets as some owners won't/can't pay for this to be done :(