The cashback site you own
https://www.imutual.co.uk/forum/
.... where's the equality in that I wonder?Are you implying a Civil Union is not legal?
Sarah » Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:45 pm
Of course not.
Not unless you're heterosexual.
Yes, we certainly wouldn't want infertile couples getting married. Whatever next, marriage for poor people or black people?rayf wrote:There's no reason to redefine "marriage" which is a union for procreation.
Yeh, that could work .....If Cameron thought it would win him more votes, perhaps he could announce if we all become Mormons then we would pay no UK tax whatsoever.expressman33 » Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:46 pm
If same sex marriage is legalized then surely the marriage of more than 2 people should be.
badtothebone wrote:Yeh, that could work .....If Cameron thought it would win him more votes, perhaps he could announce if we all become Mormons then we would pay no UK tax whatsoever.expressman33 » Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:46 pm
If same sex marriage is legalized then surely the marriage of more than 2 people should be.
Your very own harem .... watch this space anything is posssible with this government, they make up the rules as they go alongrayf » Tue Feb 05, 2013 8:12 pm
badtothebone wrote:
expressman33 » Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:46 pm
If same sex marriage is legalized then surely the marriage of more than 2 people should be.
Yeh, that could work .....If Cameron thought it would win him more votes, perhaps he could announce if we all become Mormons then we would pay no UK tax whatsoever.
Would we get tax incentives for having 7 wives? Count me in
Sarah wrote:Yes, we certainly wouldn't want infertile couples getting married.rayf wrote:There's no reason to redefine "marriage" which is a union for procreation.
going off topic or what?Sarah wrote:Whatever next, marriage for poor people or black people?