Topical debate, moral dilemmas and quirky questions. Join fellow shareholders in civilised discussions of issues of interest
-
kevinchess1
- Posts: 23770
- Joined: Mon Jun 28 2010 11:02pm
- Location: Miles away from the sea
- Has thanked: 12599 times
- Been thanked: 17167 times
-
Contact:
Post
by kevinchess1 » Tue Feb 07 2012 3:11pm
Fabio says he did not agree with the removal of JT as England captain
Do you agree with Capello?
Story
Here
What's your view?
Last edited by
kevinchess1 on Tue Feb 07 2012 8:51pm, edited 1 time in total.
Politically incorrect since 69
-
uglysteve
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Tue Nov 23 2010 5:20pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 64 times
-
Contact:
Post
by uglysteve » Tue Feb 07 2012 4:11pm
Voted Yes because it's a stupid question (to which the answer is No)
Last edited by
uglysteve on Tue Feb 07 2012 8:23pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
bobster007
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Tue Sep 27 2011 8:48pm
- Has thanked: 358 times
- Been thanked: 400 times
-
Contact:
Post
by bobster007 » Tue Feb 07 2012 5:46pm
Voted No. Not because I disagree with him but thought Capello should have kept that to himself.
Is it me but every single tournament year that England participates theres always some bad news\press. Seems like the press dont want England to do well with all bad news just before (well acouple of months) the tournament
Would have thought JT would be innocent until proven otherwise.
-
kevinchess1
- Posts: 23770
- Joined: Mon Jun 28 2010 11:02pm
- Location: Miles away from the sea
- Has thanked: 12599 times
- Been thanked: 17167 times
-
Contact:
Post
by kevinchess1 » Tue Feb 07 2012 8:54pm
Firstly I don't think any National team should be manage by a person from another country.
Puttin that aside he is the manager and is paid a lot of awful money to do the job
I feel that it should be his choice as to who is captain or what is the point of employin him
Why don't we not hav a manager and just hav a team of selectors like the England cricket
Politically incorrect since 69
-
uglysteve
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Tue Nov 23 2010 5:20pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 64 times
-
Contact:
Post
by uglysteve » Tue Feb 07 2012 8:55pm
bobster007 wrote:
Would have thought JT would be innocent until proven otherwise.
I can't see there's anyone who really thinks he isn't guilty though, and that's just specifically in relation to the charge in this instance. There's no doubt at all that he's a nasty worm...
-
kevinchess1
- Posts: 23770
- Joined: Mon Jun 28 2010 11:02pm
- Location: Miles away from the sea
- Has thanked: 12599 times
- Been thanked: 17167 times
-
Contact:
Post
by kevinchess1 » Tue Feb 07 2012 11:12pm
jimthehorsegod wrote:bobster007 wrote:
Would have thought JT would be innocent until proven otherwise.
I can't see there's anyone who really thinks he isn't guilty though, and that's just specifically in relation to the charge in this instance. There's no doubt at all that he's a nasty worm...
Steady
Barton already in trouble for 'Contempt of court' for his twitter a/c
Politically incorrect since 69
-
kevinchess1
- Posts: 23770
- Joined: Mon Jun 28 2010 11:02pm
- Location: Miles away from the sea
- Has thanked: 12599 times
- Been thanked: 17167 times
-
Contact:
Post
by kevinchess1 » Wed Feb 08 2012 11:46pm
No that capelo has resigned
Will he be goin bac ro Greendale?
Politically incorrect since 69
-
1960mackem
- Posts: 2538
- Joined: Sun Jul 11 2010 2:53am
- Has thanked: 1219 times
- Been thanked: 1755 times
-
Contact:
Post
by 1960mackem » Thu Feb 09 2012 12:02am
jimthehorsegod wrote:bobster007 wrote:
Would have thought JT would be innocent until proven otherwise.
I can't see there's anyone who really thinks he isn't guilty though, and that's just specifically in relation to the charge in this instance. There's no doubt at all that he's a nasty worm...
I always thought this country took great pride in it's democracy !!!!!
So much for the "Innocent until proven guilty"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests