-
BeautifulSunshine
- Posts: 26721
- Joined: Tue Sep 14 2010 8:23pm
- Location: [The Finest City in the World: London]
- Has thanked: 192 times
- Been thanked: 3686 times
-
Contact:
Post
by BeautifulSunshine » Mon Aug 25 2014 11:46am
myfyr wrote:I think living members should be able to transfer their shares to other members if they wish, for free or for a consideration. What do people think about that?
I like the way you think +1.
[imutual Cashback Investment Club]
-
BeautifulSunshine
- Posts: 26721
- Joined: Tue Sep 14 2010 8:23pm
- Location: [The Finest City in the World: London]
- Has thanked: 192 times
- Been thanked: 3686 times
-
Contact:
Post
by BeautifulSunshine » Mon Aug 25 2014 11:49am
blythburgh wrote:myfyr wrote:I think living members should be able to transfer their shares to other members if they wish, for free or for a consideration. What do people think about that?
I would vote for that at an AGM but maybe a small fee to cover costs and maybe the new owner of the shares should be an active member of the site.
I like the way you think +1.
Such a service should be free as the time and resources are negligible in comparison to shares with a value of 0.0000001p. (The universal principal of proportionality)
[imutual Cashback Investment Club]
-
BeautifulSunshine
- Posts: 26721
- Joined: Tue Sep 14 2010 8:23pm
- Location: [The Finest City in the World: London]
- Has thanked: 192 times
- Been thanked: 3686 times
-
Contact:
Post
by BeautifulSunshine » Mon Aug 25 2014 11:52am
underdog wrote:blythburgh wrote:myfyr wrote:I think living members should be able to transfer their shares to other members if they wish, for free or for a consideration. What do people think about that?
I would vote for that at an AGM but maybe a small fee to cover costs and maybe the new owner of the shares should be an active member of the site.
I like the way you think +1.
Such a service should be free as the time and resources are negligible in comparison to shares with a value of 0.0000001p. (The universal principal of proportionality)
Perhaps a limit-restriction could be placed. For example shares could only be transferred once in a calendar year.
[imutual Cashback Investment Club]
-
magnificent7
- Posts: 7569
- Joined: Fri Dec 03 2010 9:48pm
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 386 times
Post
by magnificent7 » Mon Aug 25 2014 5:43pm
underdog wrote:blythburgh wrote:myfyr wrote:I think living members should be able to transfer their shares to other members if they wish, for free or for a consideration. What do people think about that?
I would vote for that at an AGM but maybe a small fee to cover costs and maybe the new owner of the shares should be an active member of the site.
I like the way you think +1.
Such a service should be free as the time and resources are negligible in comparison to shares with a value of 0.0000001p. (The universal principal of proportionality)
As a mutual it would be against the underpinning principles of such an institution to charge.
-
Richard Frost
- Posts: 13260
- Joined: Tue Jun 29 2010 8:14pm
- Location: The Isle of Dreams
- Has thanked: 2876 times
- Been thanked: 6870 times
Post
by Richard Frost » Mon Aug 25 2014 6:39pm
underdog wrote:blythburgh wrote:myfyr wrote:I think living members should be able to transfer their shares to other members if they wish, for free or for a consideration. What do people think about that?
I would vote for that at an AGM but maybe a small fee to cover costs and maybe the new owner of the shares should be an active member of the site.
I like the way you think +1.
Such a service should be free as the time and resources are negligible in comparison to shares with a value of 0.0000001p. (The universal principal of proportionality)
I think it probably best to let this little huddle waffle on and then if & when it comes to an AGM will have my say then.
-
kevinchess1
- Posts: 23770
- Joined: Mon Jun 28 2010 11:02pm
- Location: Miles away from the sea
- Has thanked: 12599 times
- Been thanked: 17167 times
-
Contact:
Post
by kevinchess1 » Mon Aug 25 2014 7:55pm
Yes
Thread has served it's porpoise now
lets all move on
Politically incorrect since 69
-
blythburgh
- Posts: 17758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29 2010 7:14pm
- Location: The Far East
- Has thanked: 35046 times
- Been thanked: 6110 times
-
Contact:
Post
by blythburgh » Mon Aug 25 2014 8:52pm
Did someone mention Waffle. If you want the best go to The Waffle House in Norwich
Keep smiling because the light at the end of someone's tunnel may be you, Ron Cheneler
-
kevinchess1
- Posts: 23770
- Joined: Mon Jun 28 2010 11:02pm
- Location: Miles away from the sea
- Has thanked: 12599 times
- Been thanked: 17167 times
-
Contact:
Post
by kevinchess1 » Mon Aug 25 2014 10:36pm
blythburgh wrote:Did someone mention Waffle. If you want the best go to The Waffle House in Norwich
Like there's more than one
Politically incorrect since 69
-
superman
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Wed Mar 23 2011 10:07pm
- Has thanked: 269 times
- Been thanked: 354 times
Post
by superman » Mon Aug 25 2014 11:33pm
Torus wrote:underdog wrote:
I would vote for that at an AGM but maybe a small fee to cover costs and maybe the new owner of the shares should be an active member of the site.
I like the way you think +1.
Such a service should be free as the time and resources are negligible in comparison to shares with a value of 0.0000001p. (The universal principal of proportionality)
I think it probably best to let this little huddle waffle on and then if & when it comes to an AGM will have my say then.
Bring it on, may the best man win.
-
cccashbacklover
- Posts: 2078
- Joined: Mon Jul 05 2010 9:55pm
- Has thanked: 1195 times
- Been thanked: 1266 times
-
Contact:
Post
by cccashbacklover » Tue Aug 26 2014 2:32am
superman wrote:[
Bring it on, may the best man win.
You underestimate how many shares Torus and others have, Think 40000+ and you will be on right track
There are those who agree with and those who are convinced to agree with and I fall into neither of those categories ....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests