superman wrote: Torus wrote:
underdog wrote:We own the company, we voted for a change.
If it truly is a case that we have a say on how the company is run then this will be implemented.
A vote voted on by 40 members is not a representative vote and as KC said polls are for guidance only.
Those who wish not to use the option are free to leave it blank.
The shareholders voted in favour. Full stop.
Ignoring the fact that any decision that affects the shareholders, needs a Quorum, and 26 other misguided individuals is not it.
If the Poll is so mighty, then Richard needs to introduce a Poll removing the rights of members to insist that Polls are binding.
Not that the Polls ever were.
I would advise you to stop trying to WASTE OUR (the shareholders and other members) MONEY, or the Polls could be used against you to vote you off the site.
Even if only a majority of ONE voted in favour.
And only 3 people voted, you against and me and one other that takes objection to your attitude.
How would you like that?
There must be a rule about trouble makers, which I do understand could equally apply to me as easily as you.
If there is not a rule about disruptive behaviour, then maybe we need one to be introduced.
With or without a Poll.