imutual.co.uk

myfyr wrote:I think living members should be able to transfer their shares to other members if they wish, for free or for a consideration. What do people think about that?

I like the way you think +1.

blythburgh wrote:

myfyr wrote:I think living members should be able to transfer their shares to other members if they wish, for free or for a consideration. What do people think about that?

I would vote for that at an AGM but maybe a small fee to cover costs and maybe the new owner of the shares should be an active member of the site.

I like the way you think +1.

Such a service should be free as the time and resources are negligible in comparison to shares with a value of 0.0000001p. (The universal principal of proportionality)

underdog wrote:

blythburgh wrote:

myfyr wrote:I think living members should be able to transfer their shares to other members if they wish, for free or for a consideration. What do people think about that?

I would vote for that at an AGM but maybe a small fee to cover costs and maybe the new owner of the shares should be an active member of the site.

I like the way you think +1.

Such a service should be free as the time and resources are negligible in comparison to shares with a value of 0.0000001p. (The universal principal of proportionality)

Perhaps a limit-restriction could be placed. For example shares could only be transferred once in a calendar year.

underdog wrote:

blythburgh wrote:

myfyr wrote:I think living members should be able to transfer their shares to other members if they wish, for free or for a consideration. What do people think about that?

I would vote for that at an AGM but maybe a small fee to cover costs and maybe the new owner of the shares should be an active member of the site.

I like the way you think +1.

Such a service should be free as the time and resources are negligible in comparison to shares with a value of 0.0000001p. (The universal principal of proportionality)

As a mutual it would be against the underpinning principles of such an institution to charge.

underdog wrote:

blythburgh wrote:

myfyr wrote:I think living members should be able to transfer their shares to other members if they wish, for free or for a consideration. What do people think about that?

I would vote for that at an AGM but maybe a small fee to cover costs and maybe the new owner of the shares should be an active member of the site.

I like the way you think +1.

Such a service should be free as the time and resources are negligible in comparison to shares with a value of 0.0000001p. (The universal principal of proportionality)

I think it probably best to let this little huddle waffle on and then if & when it comes to an AGM will have my say then.

Yes
Thread has served it's porpoise now
lets all move on

Did someone mention Waffle. If you want the best go to The Waffle House in Norwich

blythburgh wrote:Did someone mention Waffle. If you want the best go to The Waffle House in Norwich

Like there's more than one

Torus wrote:

underdog wrote: I would vote for that at an AGM but maybe a small fee to cover costs and maybe the new owner of the shares should be an active member of the site.

I like the way you think +1.

Such a service should be free as the time and resources are negligible in comparison to shares with a value of 0.0000001p. (The universal principal of proportionality)

I think it probably best to let this little huddle waffle on and then if & when it comes to an AGM will have my say then.

Bring it on, may the best man win.

superman wrote:[

Bring it on, may the best man win.

You underestimate how many shares Torus and others have, Think 40000+ and you will be on right track