imutual.co.uk

Torus wrote:Well if nothing else all this rubbish helps keep the forum alive. Can't see any other point. There seems to be no real discussion making the case for the proposal..

I see where you are coming from. Personally, it's not something I will lose sleep over.

An idea was put forward. Those who wished to comment did so, those who wished to vote did so. Whatever the outcome, I will tweak the decision in my favour.

Torus wrote:There seems to be no real discussion making the case for the proposal..

Are they not MY shares?
Should I not have the right to do with them as I see fit
I earn them fair and square and should be able to do with them as I see fit
(Bit of the devils avocado there)

Is this member the same as the troublemaker of similar name on

viewtopic.php?f=34&t=26087

If so I ask that Admin seriously consider adding the clause about disruptive and/or obnoxious behaviour.

I can recognise obsessive behaviour and this is definitely too much,

One problem with allowing cash purchases of shares from one member to another, and gifting, and all the other malarkey is that it could be used for Money Laundering, and we do not want Richard to spend 14 years in jail for falling foul of POCA, Anti terrorist Act and the Money Laundering Acts.

Perhaps Plod would be interested in this thread?

No, it's not the same person

Squire wrote:Is this member the same as the troublemaker of similar name on

viewtopic.php?f=34&t=26087

There must be thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of superman wannabes.

Squire wrote:Perhaps Plod would be interested in this thread?

Personally, you are welcome to inform Plod.

Before you make a rash decision, in my country, the wasting of Plods time is a offence.

I won't wish for The Great Squire to tread the wrong side of the law.

Squire wrote: One problem with allowing cash purchases of shares from one member to another, and gifting, and all the other malarkey is that it could be used for Money Laundering, and we do not want Richard to spend 14 years in jail for falling foul of POCA, Anti terrorist Act and the Money Laundering Acts.

Isn't that what happen normally with Share dealings

kevinchess1 wrote:

Torus wrote:There seems to be no real discussion making the case for the proposal..

Are they not MY shares?
Should I not have the right to do with them as I see fit
I earn them fair and square and should be able to do with them as I see fit
(Bit of the devils avocado there)

Posts: 10102
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:02 pm
Location: Miles away from the sea
Has thanked: 4828 times
Been thanked: 5825 times
Sharing: *****

In 10102 posts, since Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:02 pm, from Miles away from the sea, having thanked 4828 times, whilst been thanked 5825 times, and having shared ***** that the best thing you have ever said. (Even if it was whilst playing devils advocate.)

underdog wrote:

kevinchess1 wrote:

Torus wrote:There seems to be no real discussion making the case for the proposal..

Are they not MY shares?
Should I not have the right to do with them as I see fit
I earn them fair and square and should be able to do with them as I see fit
(Bit of the devils avocado there)

Posts: 10102
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:02 pm
Location: Miles away from the sea
Has thanked: 4828 times
Been thanked: 5825 times
Sharing: *****

In 10102 posts, since Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:02 pm, from Miles away from the sea, having thanked 4828 times, whilst been thanked 5825 times, and having shared ***** that the best thing you have ever said. (Even if it was whilst playing devils advocate.)

Somehow i doubt it

kevinchess1 wrote:

Squire wrote: One problem with allowing cash purchases of shares from one member to another, and gifting, and all the other malarkey is that it could be used for Money Laundering, and we do not want Richard to spend 14 years in jail for falling foul of POCA, Anti terrorist Act and the Money Laundering Acts.

Isn't that what happen normally with Share dealings

They have special rules to make it "legal", which is why no banker has been jailed, and never will, for the mess they got us, the British taxpayer into.