Page 3 of 6

Re: Citizen Khan pushes ahead with the plan to shoot himself in the foot

Posted: Sat Sep 14 2019 4:29pm
by pabenny
Boro Boy wrote:
Sat Sep 14 2019 4:21pm
...the leaders chosen advisors seem to be saying that a remedy to some ills is to do away with all private vehicles.
Even more twisting. Absolutely nothing in the linked story to suggest the publishers or authors of the report are 'chosen advisers' to the Labour leader.

Re: Citizen Khan pushes ahead with the plan to shoot himself in the foot

Posted: Sat Sep 14 2019 4:42pm
by BeautifulSunshine
Yawn...

Re: Citizen Khan pushes ahead with the plan to shoot himself in the foot

Posted: Sat Sep 14 2019 5:34pm
by Richard Frost
Boro Boy wrote:
Sat Sep 14 2019 4:21pm
So what you are saying is, when someone votes for the Labour Party they are voting for a manifesto and a puppet leader who may or may not carry it out.
And the difference between this and any other party? Oh yes of course the Brexit Party who have no manifesto at all and will do whatever their revered dictator wants them to do.

https://metro.co.uk/2019/05/16/nigel-fa ... k-9580147/

Re: Citizen Khan pushes ahead with the plan to shoot himself in the foot

Posted: Sat Sep 14 2019 6:01pm
by BeautifulSunshine
William Joseph1 wrote:
Sat Sep 14 2019 5:34pm
Boro Boy wrote:
Sat Sep 14 2019 4:21pm
So what you are saying is, when someone votes for the Labour Party they are voting for a manifesto and a puppet leader who may or may not carry it out.
And the difference between this and any other party? Oh yes of course the Brexit Party who have no manifesto at all and will do whatever their revered dictator wants them to do.

https://metro.co.uk/2019/05/16/nigel-fa ... k-9580147/
One cannot doubt he is personality unto himself.

Re: Citizen Khan pushes ahead with the plan to shoot himself in the foot

Posted: Sat Sep 14 2019 11:36pm
by Boro Boy
AAAlphaThunder wrote:
Sat Sep 14 2019 6:01pm
William Joseph1 wrote:
Sat Sep 14 2019 5:34pm
Boro Boy wrote:
Sat Sep 14 2019 4:21pm
So what you are saying is, when someone votes for the Labour Party they are voting for a manifesto and a puppet leader who may or may not carry it out.
And the difference between this and any other party? Oh yes of course the Brexit Party who have no manifesto at all and will do whatever their revered dictator wants them to do.

https://metro.co.uk/2019/05/16/nigel-fa ... k-9580147/
One cannot doubt he is personality unto himself.
...and he doesn't have the arrogance to suggest that he will take away the legal right of individuals to have their own private transport..! :wtf:

Unlike some: https://www.petrolprices.com/news/priva ... hink-tank/

Re: Citizen Khan pushes ahead with the plan to shoot himself in the foot

Posted: Sun Sep 15 2019 8:10am
by pabenny
Repeating the link again it doesn't make your spin on the story any less a twisting of the facts.

Re: Citizen Khan pushes ahead with the plan to shoot himself in the foot

Posted: Sun Sep 15 2019 10:55am
by Boro Boy
pabenny wrote:
Sun Sep 15 2019 8:10am
Repeating the link again it doesn't make your spin on the story any less a twisting of the facts.
No twist here: Corbyn's top advisors have put forward a proposal to bad all private vehicles...!!! No twist to the article. :eh:

Re: Citizen Khan pushes ahead with the plan to shoot himself in the foot

Posted: Sun Sep 15 2019 11:37am
by pabenny
Perhaps I'm missing something here.

The article mentions (once, plus in the headline) that the think-tank producing the report are pro-Corbyn. I don't see anywhere where it mentions that they are actually his advisers - top or otherwise.

Even the article says that the paper is a non-event, "with nothing more substantial behind it than pushing a weak political agenda"

Re: Citizen Khan pushes ahead with the plan to shoot himself in the foot

Posted: Sun Sep 15 2019 3:48pm
by BeautifulSunshine
pabenny wrote:
Sun Sep 15 2019 8:10am
Repeating the link again it doesn't make your spin on the story any less a twisting of the facts.
+1

Re: Citizen Khan pushes ahead with the plan to shoot himself in the foot

Posted: Sun Sep 15 2019 4:53pm
by Boro Boy
pabenny wrote:
Sun Sep 15 2019 11:37am
Perhaps I'm missing something here.

The article mentions (once, plus in the headline) that the think-tank producing the report are pro-Corbyn. I don't see anywhere where it mentions that they are actually his advisers - top or otherwise.

Even the article says that the paper is a non-event, "with nothing more substantial behind it than pushing a weak political agenda"
So you're now trying to isolate Corbyn from his own advisors....!?! :wtf: