imutual.co.uk

Some may be confused, was Gone with the Wind an historical novel/film depicting a fictional story but showing a realistic historical background or was it merely promoting racism?

We run the risk of attempting to blank off periods of history and that never ends well... https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-ente ... 57781.html

For once I agree with you.... I'm uneasy at these knee-jerk reactions. Whilst I understand the issues with some historical personalities or representations, they happened, they just need to be contextualised. Criticising someone for investing in a company that supported the slave trade is a bit off, when nobody saw the issue at the time and it was simply a standard business practice. Should we seek out all those who have made money from investment in Tobacco firms, or Drinks companies - shall we remove Churchill, Drake, Raleigh, etc. from history because of their dubious episodes?

Any context also needs to consider the plight of indentured servants and transported criminals during this same period - whilst these were not "slaves" as their servitude was time-limited, it made little difference for many who did not survive - so the concepts of "freedom" were very different back then. I'm also concerned that noody seems to criticise the part played by other blacks or arabs in the slave trade - many slaves were sold on as slaves having been captured in raids or wars with their local rivals or arab slave dealers who had existed for centuries.

None of this in any way lessens my condemnation of slavery ..... but it does suggest that the phrase "Hindsight is 20:20" has never been more accurate.

They continued: “These depictions are certainly counter to WarnerMedia’s values, so when we return the film to HBO Max, it will return with a discussion of its historical context and a denouncement of those very depictions, but will be presented as it was originally created, because to do otherwise would be the same as claiming these prejudices never existed.

“If we are to create a more just, equitable and inclusive future, we must first acknowledge and understand our history.”

It seems to me that HBO max are being very responsible in their attitude towards this. They are withdrawing it only until they are able to contextualise it and present it in the way it was originally intended.

Generally speaking though I am on the side of allowing these things to continue, with where necessary explanations and some movement perhaps to museums. Where objects can be presented and explained.

I do not think history can/should be erased. It should be presented in a way that explains and enables people to learn and grow.

Understand but aren't adverts like the following promoting racism?: https://www.etsy.com/featured/blackowne ... dium=email

If you look hard enough, you can take offence at any film. I remember the fuss over Dambusters because of the dogs name.

In USA there's a lot of pressure to not sure films that normalise drugs and smoking. But people want theses films to also be realistic!

How long before 'Jaws; is black listed by Peta because it portrays Great white sharks in a bad light

Boro Boy wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 10 2020 5:43pm

Understand but aren't adverts like the following promoting racism?: https://www.etsy.com/featured/blackowne ... dium=email

No, because blacks cant be racist.

kevinchess1 wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 10 2020 7:46pm

Boro Boy wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 10 2020 5:43pm

Understand but aren't adverts like the following promoting racism?: https://www.etsy.com/featured/blackowne ... dium=email

No, because blacks cant be racist.

???

Just wait till someone stumbles across ‘Family Guy.’

So HBO withdraw Gone with the Wind because of the racist and demeaning portrayal of Black people as slaves...!

It's good job HBO do not publish the Bible... think about it!!!

Look at this a different way:

There are many things from fiction or historical commemorations that jar with today's prevailing standards. When's it right to let them pass and when should we censor (or censure) them? I note, for instance, that archive TV featuring Jimmy Saville or Rolf Harris is never broadcast and Gary Glitter records are never on the radio.

With emotions running high in the US about racial injustice, perhaps a temporary withdrawal of GtW is a prudent gesture.