Page 9 of 10

Re: LV

Posted: Fri Dec 17 2021 8:13am
by Official_Froggitt
planteria wrote:
Thu Dec 16 2021 9:13pm
or perhaps a payment based upon the total value of qualifying policies?
0.1% for each year of any amount is still only buttons.

Re: LV

Posted: Fri Dec 17 2021 10:24am
by blythburgh
planteria wrote:
Sat Dec 11 2021 9:20pm
that's interesting Trustee, they didn't call me or any of my family.
i strongly suspect that Froggitt will be right re the outcome, unfortunately.
it would be 'nice' if LV policies which provide membership then provide membership of RLon.
'im indoors got a phone call

Re: LV

Posted: Thu Dec 23 2021 7:04pm
by planteria
this isn't new news, but interesting that RLon were pushing for three party discussions:

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/mar ... pital.html

can anyone see an outcome to this other than RLon absorbing LV as they did RLiv?

Re: LV

Posted: Mon Feb 07 2022 4:04pm
by Official_Froggitt
https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/mar ... utual.html

Those muggs who voted against Bain have ensured that everyone will get precisely nothing.

Re: LV

Posted: Tue Feb 08 2022 8:47am
by planteria
not a massive blow, but i take your point Froggitt. it reads to me as though they may be trying to work towards LV members becoming RLon members.

Re: LV

Posted: Tue Feb 08 2022 10:15am
by blythburgh
Official_Froggitt wrote:
Mon Feb 07 2022 4:04pm
https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/mar ... utual.html

Those muggs who voted against Bain have ensured that everyone will get precisely nothing.
And how many people voted against Bain knowing they would get nothing as they had the wrong policies? Were they mugs?

Re: LV

Posted: Tue Feb 08 2022 10:54am
by Richard Frost
blythburgh wrote:
Tue Feb 08 2022 10:15am
Official_Froggitt wrote:
Mon Feb 07 2022 4:04pm
https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/mar ... utual.html

Those muggs who voted against Bain have ensured that everyone will get precisely nothing.
And how many people voted against Bain knowing they would get nothing as they had the wrong policies? Were they mugs?
I suspect they wanted the company to remain a mutual and that £100 was not enough to sell out for. I personally will not miss the £100 I would have got had the Directors continued to line their pockets and sell to Bain

Re: LV

Posted: Wed Feb 09 2022 6:24pm
by Richard Frost

Re: LV

Posted: Thu Feb 10 2022 7:28pm
by Official_Froggitt
blythburgh wrote:
Tue Feb 08 2022 10:15am
Official_Froggitt wrote:
Mon Feb 07 2022 4:04pm
https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/mar ... utual.html

Those muggs who voted against Bain have ensured that everyone will get precisely nothing.
And how many people voted against Bain knowing they would get nothing as they had the wrong policies? Were they mugs?
I thought everyone got £100 and WP members got a few buttons extra? What didn't qualify?

Re: LV

Posted: Fri Feb 11 2022 10:42am
by blythburgh
Official_Froggitt wrote:
Thu Feb 10 2022 7:28pm
blythburgh wrote:
Tue Feb 08 2022 10:15am
Official_Froggitt wrote:
Mon Feb 07 2022 4:04pm
https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/mar ... utual.html

Those muggs who voted against Bain have ensured that everyone will get precisely nothing.
And how many people voted against Bain knowing they would get nothing as they had the wrong policies? Were they mugs?
I thought everyone got £100 and WP members got a few buttons extra? What didn't qualify?
I thought it was only certain policies that would qualify, could have been wrong. Not a member so did not get a chance to vote