Topical debate, moral dilemmas and quirky questions. Join fellow shareholders in civilised discussions of issues of interest
-
kevinchess1
- Posts: 23770
- Joined: Mon Jun 28 2010 11:02pm
- Location: Miles away from the sea
- Has thanked: 12599 times
- Been thanked: 17167 times
-
Contact:
Post
by kevinchess1 » Fri Apr 06 2012 9:23am
Story
Here
Will it make a difference?
Politically incorrect since 69
-
Sarah
- Posts: 5869
- Joined: Sat Jun 26 2010 10:01am
- Has thanked: 432 times
- Been thanked: 4445 times
-
Contact:
Post
by Sarah » Fri Apr 06 2012 9:54am
Hasn't this measure already been implemented for quite some time in Scotland? Did it work there? Has minimum alcohol pricing in Scotland solved drunkenness there too? No.
Anyway, here's what I think they could try -- the minimum age for buying tobacco products for personal use should be raised by 1 year every year. In this way, the revenue earned from the taxes on tobacco would be reduced only very gradually. Smoking would be stopped for every new generation and eventually for everyone, so long as we believe that prohibition itself works. Of course prohibition doesn't work for hard drugs and didn't work too effectively for alcohol either, but this plan should at least cut down on the numbers smoking by a significant percentage. I realise there will also be difficulties with tourists who smoke and resident smokers importing tobacco from other countries, but I've not heard any better ideas!
-
itsmeagain
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Wed Nov 24 2010 8:07pm
- Location: planet zanussi
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
-
Contact:
Post
by itsmeagain » Fri Apr 06 2012 8:10pm
Its been like that in our local sommerfield for a few weeks and all it has done is make the assistants more bad tempered as it causes so much more bother for them .First they have to remember what is where and then move the covers to get at the stuff
I have not seen the queue lessen any in fact it gets longer as it takes more time to serve each person
-
Luke_PieStalker
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Tue Jul 06 2010 3:25pm
- Has thanked: 577 times
- Been thanked: 1415 times
-
Contact:
Post
by Luke_PieStalker » Fri Apr 06 2012 9:22pm
So being aware that a shop sells one of the worlds most addictive drugs, BUT is now behind a thin casing will stop people buying?
By that logic, people must have been walking past and caught the image of ciggies on display and THEN decided to take up smoking.
Yeah....
-
superman
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Wed Mar 23 2011 10:07pm
- Has thanked: 269 times
- Been thanked: 354 times
Post
by superman » Fri Apr 06 2012 11:01pm
what the eyes cannot see the heart still wants.
-
Luke_PieStalker
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Tue Jul 06 2010 3:25pm
- Has thanked: 577 times
- Been thanked: 1415 times
-
Contact:
Post
by Luke_PieStalker » Fri Apr 06 2012 11:23pm
superman wrote:what the eyes cannot see the heart still wants.
This is also the opinion of Sunderland fans when it comes to trophies.
-
racquetstringer
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Mar 10 2012 12:44pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
-
Contact:
Post
by racquetstringer » Sat Apr 07 2012 12:17am
Amazing what lengths this and previous government take to put barriers in the way of people wishing to purchase cigarettes rather than banning smoking altogether. Its not that im for smoking, but the way the Gov manipulates and changes peoples behaviour rather than banning something - Polictics, hey ! I wonder what they will put barriers in front of next?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests