DittoMel wrote:Agreed.richard@imutual wrote:Kind of you to offer, but I'm not going to take back any awards already announced. Plus you deserve it for your general contributions
DittoMel wrote:Agreed.richard@imutual wrote:Kind of you to offer, but I'm not going to take back any awards already announced. Plus you deserve it for your general contributions
24 Hours on, My reasons/motives for my comments made within an hour of O/P appear to have been mis-understood.cashbacklover wrote:No offence meant to Macliam,and not intending to be controversial - 4 ( four), second placed thanks came from registered users from outside of UK.
cashbacklover wrote: I am absolutely certain that at least one other Imutual member had 5 “votes” from regular Imutual users who are also most likely all UK residents, Why hasn’t that member been awarded with 10 shares? - Edit If Non Uk factor was to be taken out unless their is a higher qualifying member then this member should also be awarded 25 shares.
I am amazed that in all the efforts Richard has made to stop spammers this has been overlooked. Immediate steps should of course be made to redress the situation. No one should lose out on shares because of this.Torus wrote:Immediate steps should be taken to screen out all non UK members from the site, so this can not happen again. It seems to me that there has been a big mistake made in the ability of these people to join in the first place.
Yes it does matter, in one sense you are right, the shares are worthless so what is the point? However the principle that the voting system is rigged or can be manipulated is very important and all steps should be taken to eliminate that.expressman33 wrote:Does it matter , it's only a few shares not exactly life or death
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests