One thought that comes to mind is to use an equation of number of thankers multiplied by their shareholding.1960mackem wrote:What other measurement tools have you got to give a fair outcome ?
I should have thought this was the best option. The existing way does seem to be unfair and the cap would avoid the problem of artifical promotion.richard@imutual wrote:Could do. But then that might go too far the other way, enabling a number of new members to (either innocently or otherwise) artificially promote a post above other contributions which are thought to be better by more established members
A cap of, say, 1000 shares would be a good solution. If there is thought to be a problem
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests