Yes.Oggy wrote:The trouble with the monthly posts report is that many I'm sure post something just to get the share. I think we're all guilty of one or two words posts!
We may review the "shares for posting" incentive soon (e.g. have it based on posts being thanked, not just posted) but I think it's been successful. I don't detect much 'artificial' posting, and the report also shows a clear trend -i.e. for more posting and posters, regardless of incentives.Oggy wrote:The trouble with the monthly posts report is that many I'm sure post something just to get the share.
Personally, I don't see how 'rewarding' people for all posts is going to help the argument that the shares are any more worthy than Monopoly money.richard@imutual wrote:We may review the "shares for posting" incentive soon (e.g. have it based on posts being thanked, not just posted)Oggy wrote:The trouble with the monthly posts report is that many I'm sure post something just to get the share.
Oggy wrote:The trouble with the monthly posts report is that many I'm sure post something just to get the share. I think we're all guilty of one or two words posts!
richard@imutual wrote:We may review the "shares for posting" incentive soon (e.g. have it based on posts being thanked, not just posted)Oggy wrote:The trouble with the monthly posts report is that many I'm sure post something just to get the share.
Richard repliedaupt wrote:couldn't one thanks be worth 1 share?
Richard wrote: It would certainly be fairer but would this run the risk of turning the Thanks system (working well so far) into a 'You thank me and I'll thank you' affair?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests