[quote="Sarah"][quote="richard@imutual"]In general, the stats suggest that the 'shares for posting' is not a major reason for the increased forum activity.[/quote]

I disagree! :shifty:[/quote]

Well, I suppose we can all interpret stats in different ways. But the vast majority of increased posts have not been rewarded with a share under this incentive

Anyway, I've now opened a new poll on whether to change the shares-for-posts offer - see [url=http://www.imutual.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11637]here[/url] :)

[quote="coz93"]Posts should be constructive/informative - not one word answers as already shown on this post ! It is too easy to earn shares this way and ultimately devalues them.[/quote]

This was my point exactly. In my opinion lots of posts are being created, which are one or two word posts and did not add value to the forums. That is not to say that sometimes one or two word posts always do not add value. Some are very informative.

[quote="coz93"]Posts should be constructive/informative - not one word answers as already shown on this post ! It is too easy to earn shares this way and ultimately devalues them.[/quote]
Yes but you only get 1 share for your first post of the day and that wasn't Oggys first post
I'm in favour of reducin the amount of shares issused for postin

Posts should be constructive/informative - not one word answers as already shown on this post ! It is too easy to earn shares this way and ultimately devalues them.

[quote="richard@imutual"]In general, the stats suggest that the 'shares for posting' is not a major reason for the increased forum activity.[/quote]

I disagree! :shifty:

At the mo, you can get 5 shares a day for postin;
3 for offers
1 for just postin
1 if you start a topic that get's a reply.
Maybe ltd this to 3 in total :?:

LOL

Well, as you will know from [url=http://www.imutual.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7402]this topic[/url] I agree with you that the time has come to revise the 'shares for posts' incentive, but in a democratic vote the members opted for the status quo. Probably worth having a further poll now, as that was 3 months ago

On this specific point:

[quote]Witness the post below which started off being useful and worthwhile. Although in my opinion should never have been started but reported via the broken link facility, but ended up with totally useless replies[/quote]

With daily click offers, we encourage people to report link/tracking problems to the forum initially rather than using the 'report broken link' button, so the poster was correct in doing this. This is because they can stop working every now and then, sometimes only for specific users and usually for a very short period. If people reported a broken link every time this happened, our staff would be employed full-time answering such queries! :shock: It helps if people can check with their fellow members as to whether the problem is universal, before escalating it to us. You often see several members reply to confirm that an offer is also working / not working for them; these multiple posts serve a genuine purpose and are not necessarily motivated by the offer of a share.

In general, the stats suggest that the 'shares for posting' is not a major reason for the increased forum activity. It seemed to give it a 'jump start' when it was introduced (monthly posts increased to 1175 and 79 posters), but activity has tripled since then whilst the shares awarded for posting has only increased by 60%.

Yup! :lol:

Me too :lol:

[quote="Muraidi"]But surely a lot of it is being artificially generated by bribing people with shares. [ ... ] Although in my opinion should never have been started but reported via the broken link facility, but ended up with totally useless replies.[/quote]

I agree! :shifty: