Strange comparison when people can do both if they wish.One Eyed Snake wrote:
The time involved in submitting a HCP is probably more cost effective than the time involved in doing recurring clicks for coppers.
Strange comparison when people can do both if they wish.One Eyed Snake wrote:
The time involved in submitting a HCP is probably more cost effective than the time involved in doing recurring clicks for coppers.
Of course they can. My comment wasn't suggesting otherwise, merely a riposte to the suggestion doing HCPs to get a bigger payout was a time consuming exercise for the reward:cashbacklover wrote:Strange comparison when people can do both if they wish.One Eyed Snake wrote:
The time involved in submitting a HCP is probably more cost effective than the time involved in doing recurring clicks for coppers.
richard@imutual wrote:OES - if we're talking about existing tcb users who can get a better rate at imutual on merchants they use regularly, I guess they'll fall into two camps: those who are prepared to take the time to submit a HCP request each time they do a transaction through tcb; and those who prefer just to go via imutual, get the highest rate and not have to do any more.
He means they used to go at it at Rpoints. Still braggs about the New years bash 2006.kevinchess1 wrote:They used to go it at Rpointst
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 183 guests